Insights

Category: Market EntryFormat: Essay

Notes on the first ninety days:

A partner's essay.

The Manhattan skyline at sunset

A founder I know landed in New York last spring with a working product, a Series B behind her, and an executive summary that had been through the board twice. By month three she had a beautifully appointed office in Flatiron with an office manager who knew every visitor's coffee order. She also had a pipeline of exactly two live conversations. Both came from people she had known before she moved. The office had produced nothing.

I have watched this pattern play out enough times to have stopped being surprised by it, and the reason it plays out is quieter than it looks. Founders seldom arrive in a new market with bad strategies. Most of them arrive with unusually good ones. What happens is that they treat the first ninety days as an operational period while the market is treating it as a commercial one, and the two clocks fall out of sync in a way that takes eighteen months to correct.

The number that tends to get quoted here is that roughly seven in ten international market entries fail to pay back inside three years, a figure documented in cross-border expansion analyses by both boutique advisers and industry researchers. I find the number itself less useful than the pattern beneath it. Almost every entry I have watched fail follows the same arc. The founder arrives. The founder spends the first ninety days on incorporation and hiring, on lease negotiation, on the internal meetings a growing office demands. Meanwhile, in the buildings the founder is not visiting, the market is quietly forming an opinion of whether this company is now serious about the geography. That opinion tends to set by day ninety, and once set it takes twelve to eighteen months of expensive counter-signalling to shift.

The uncomfortable truth is that the operational work of setting up in a market and the commercial work of entering it are two different jobs sharing one start date, and only one of them compounds. Hiring an office manager is real work that generates no commercial signal in the market at all. In the first ninety days a founder has roughly forty external working hours per week and roughly six hundred hours of things that need doing. The choices they make about what fits into those forty hours quietly determine how the next three years unfold.

The founders who I have watched compound tend to arrive with three things in place. First: a target account list already assembled (usually twenty to forty names, defined against a thesis about who moves first and why). Second: a calendar that is 30 to 40% booked with buyers and operators before they land. Third: an explicit agreement with themselves and their board that the first ninety days are for external time. They do the operational work in the evenings and on Sunday nights. It is inelegant and it works. The founders who I have watched stall tend to do the opposite. They protect the internal calendar because it feels like the responsible thing to do, then lose the window in a way they realise only in month seven.

The piece of this I find hardest to convey in a first meeting is that the counter-programme is emotionally difficult. The intellectual side is straightforward. It requires a founder to accept, in the first ninety days, two things at once. The plan they arrived with is a working hypothesis. The buyer conversations happening in weeks two through eight are the pressure test. Many of those conversations will contradict the plan. The founders who rewrite the plan on the evidence of the first fifteen buyer meetings are usually in market by month five. The founders who file the contradictions as noise and continue with the plan tend to spend the following year trying to reset a first impression that has already set.

I have written about this pattern here, in an essay, because it does not lend itself to a keynote. The lesson is quiet. It is about how a founder allocates the calendar when pulled in every operational direction at once. If there is a single thing I would say to a founder about to land in a new market, it is that the market has already begun the ninety-day evaluation before the plane lands. The founder's calendar is the only variable they fully control.